HomeBuying our CD's Contact HONEY ONE MUSICMusicians & Credits The Flashlight

I'm not a singer, I'm not a player in a band. I'm just a writer with a flashlight in my hand. I'm prepared to shine it brightly upon command. The Truth compels me. Love encourages me. Wisdom guides me. The Spirit befriended me. Now, time to shine the light on darkness...

That we live in the time of universal deceit is evident to those with eyes that see. What is not quite as easy to detect is controlled opposition posing as patriots.

Pamela Gorman Censors and Speads the Democracy LIE

Accuphrase = THIEVES AND CRIMINALS

Birds Of A Feather (Adrian Salbuchi Exposed)

Rense.com's Greatest Hits

 


"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." C.S. Lewis

Imagine a world in which a company contacts you to hire you for your services, you agree to do the job for $120.00 and then provide the service and invoice said company. Instead of paying the amount to which they are contractually obligated, they declare they are not giving you one penny of it. They have determined this money belongs to another and they are empowered to steal your remuneration by sending the amount past due to a third party not privy to the agreement. They claim the "law" empowers them to steal from you without any recourse on your part. Wrong, Bjorn Kommedal and Tim Lowenhaupt of Accuphrase. You are THIEVES that are guilty of stealing from my family and you will most certainly not get away with your crimes. Crimes, in plural.

Accuphrase not only stole from us, they proceeded to willfully send a false information return.

Check this out...

Dear Bjorn, Tim and all concerned at Accuphrase,
Let us begin by thanking you for giving us hard evidence that you willfully sent a fraudulent information return to the IRS. Your 1099 misc proclaims for the year 2009 you paid us $xxxx.xx of which $120.00 you sent to the IRS. But that is blatantly FALSE! We have the proof found in an e-mail sent to us by Bjorn Kommedal.

Check it out...


-------- Original Message --------


Subject:

Re: Tax Related Questions

Date:

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:27:08 +0000

From:

bkommedal@accuphrase.com

Reply-To:

bkommedal@accuphrase.com

To:

Michal Circolone

CC:

 

I have no interest in keeping your money. I will send you the payment immediately upon receipt of your EIN/SSN. We work with about 200 US-based linguists on a freelance basis, and I have NEVER EVER had this issues before with anyone. I don't get it.

B
Accuphrase



Do you see the date on Mr. Bjorn’s e-mail? Do you see Mr. Bjorn proclaiming he did NOT send $120.00 to the IRS in 2009? He is on record admitting the invoice in question is past due and pending payment on January 20, 2010! Are we to believe Bjorn is promising payment of something he's already sent to the IRS? You are caught and soon to be in trouble. We told you to seek the advice of an attorney. Now, will we see you and your attorney in court? You can explain to the court why you stole $120.00 and proceeded to willfully file a fraudulent information return.

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 76 > Subchapter B > § 7434

§ 7434. Civil damages for fraudulent filing of information returns
(a) In general
If any person willfully files a fraudulent information return with respect to payments purported to be made to any other person, such other person may bring a civil action for damages against the person so filing such return.
(b) Damages
In any action brought under subsection (a), upon a finding of liability on the part of the defendant, the defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff in an amount equal to the greater of $5,000 or the sum of—
(1) any actual damages sustained by the plaintiff as a proximate result of the filing of the fraudulent information return (including any costs attributable to resolving deficiencies asserted as a result of such filing),
(2) the costs of the action, and
(3) in the court’s discretion, reasonable attorneys’ fees.

This is getting fun, huh? Instead of just simply paying the bill, Accuphrase is now guilty of willfully filing a fraudulent information return and can be sued to the tune of $5,000.00. I don't get it. Why not pay the amount you owe instead of willfully filing a fraudulent information return? The criminal mind at work, I presume. The crimes of Bjorn Kommedal and Tim Lowenhaupt and Accuphrase don't end here. By stealing the fruit of our labor they are guilty of forcing us in to PEONAGE. Making someone work without pay is a form of slavery. Perhaps, slavery is considered lawful in Bjorn's homeland, but in the USA peonage is a crime punishable by law.

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 77 > § 1581

§ 1581. Peonage; obstructing enforcement 
(a) Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of peonage, or arrests any person with the intent of placing him in or returning him to a condition of peonage, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If death results from the violation of this section, or if the violation includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or the attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, the defendant shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.

(b) Whoever obstructs, or attempts to obstruct, or in any way interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this section, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed in subsection (a).

I don't get it. Why would one risk imprisonment instead of simply paying the amount due? That is what criminals do, isn't it? The threat of time in prison is not a deterrent to the criminals among us. I wish I could say the crimes of Bjorn and Tim of Accuphrase end here, but, these guys are guilty of more. Check it out. They claim to be a "Trade or Business" as defined in the IR Code and therefore the code empowers them to steal from others. I'm very certain neither Bjorn nor Tim nor anyone at Accuphrase even knows the definition of "Trade or Business" as defined in the IR Code. Just like stealing is a crime we in society frown upon and punish, so is pretending to be empowered by the IR Code a crime...

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 43 > § 912
§ 912. Officer or employee of the United States
Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

No one shall be deprived of their life, liberty or property without first getting DUE PROCESS OF LAW. Accuphrase illegally pretending to be a "Trade or Business" and stealing from us may be considered due process where Bjorn is originally from, but in the USA that is criminal activity that we Americans must and will put an end to. We cannot continue to let foreigners come into our country and get away with criminal activity. I would like to see a copy of the check allegedly sent to the IRS. The date on the check, if the check was even sent, is also evidence of the willful fraudulent filing. Have your attorney prepare a copy of the check for us, Accuphrase. I don't get it. Why risk spending all this time in prison when one can easily pay the amount they are contractually obligated to pay?

Folks, criminals like those found at Accuphrase are the very worst kind of criminals. Their crimes are commited with the approval of their own conscience. They steal from families and actually feel good about it. They believe the LIE that one needs to have and provide upon request, a social security number, in order to live and work in the USA. That is false and even upon being shown the law, they ignore it and proceed to act under color of law. Here is the law that Bjorn and Accuphrase completely ignored:

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 61 > Subchapter A > PART III > Subpart B > Sec. 6041.

Sec. 6041. - Information at source
(a)

Payments of $600 or more
All persons engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income (other than payments to which section 6042(a)(1), 6044(a)(1), 6047(e), 6049(a), or 6050N(a) applies, and other than payments with respect to which a statement is required under the authority of section 6042(a)(2), 6044(a)(2), or 6045), or $600 or more in any taxable year, or, in the case of such payments made by the United States, the officers or employees of the United States having information as to such payments and required to make returns in regard thereto by the regulations hereinafter provided for, shall render a true and accurate return to the Secretary, under such regulations and in such form and manner and to such extent as may be prescribed by the Secretary, setting forth the amount of such gains, profits, and income, and the name and address of the recipient of such payment.

 

This code section is where the use of the Form 1099 originates (reporting payments to individuals NOT "covered" by Social Security). Carefully note that this reporting requirement DOES NOT REQUIRE a Social Security number, a TIN, or any other number from the individual. This section ONLY requires the NAME and ADDRESS of the recipient. Socialism is voluntary in the USA. No law requires anyone to have a social security number to live and work in the USA. We asked the criminals at Accuphrase to show us the law that empowers them to do as they are doing and we got nothing. Criminals don't need no stinkin' law, right, Bjorn?

Do we want our country to become what it most certainly will become if we all stole from each other under color of law? Where Bjorn is originally from, perhaps stealing with a clean conscience is common practice, but this is the USA and we don't appreciate thieves. We punish them. Bjorn and company not only stole from us, they used lies to accomplish it. The invoice was not paid in 2009 and therefore cannot be treated as an expense for 2009. Bjorn Kommedal willfully lied when he sent the fraudulent information return, and most likely lied on his own return declaring the invoice to be an expense for the year ending 2009. All these crimes mean nothing to him. Apparantly, his satisfaction comes from stealing from the innocent and willfully submitting false information to the IRS, not by following the written law.

Bottom line, Accuphrase took something and did not pay for it. That is called stealing. Thou Shall Not Steal!

If Accuphrase can refuse to pay an invoice they are contractually obligated to pay, and instead of doing the honest thing, they LIE by willfully filing a fraudulent information return, as they did to us, they can do it to anyone. Translators and potential customers, BEWARE!

Is it time to speak with your attorney, yet?

See you on that day your crimes get punished, Accuphrase.

 


 

Message to Adrian Salbuchi:

Hello from the USA. It appears you treat the words democracy and republic as synonyms. Is this intentional ignorance or is it residual brainwashing?

Also, I'm willing to go out on a limb and declare the name of the one world leader that will deceive many, will be Jesus or some variation of it. Look at what Jesus has the Christians doing in Iraq and Afghanistan and lo the entire world.

John Adams, the country's second president, was drawn to the study of law but faced pressure from his father to become a clergyman. He wrote that he found among the lawyers 'noble and gallant achievments" but among the clergy, the "pretended sanctity of some absolute dunces". Late in life he wrote: "Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!"

It was during Adam's administration that the Senate ratified the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which states in Article XI that "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion."
From:
The Character of John Adams by Peter Shaw, pp. 17 (1976, North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC) Quoting a letter by JA to Charles Cushing Oct 19, 1756, and John Adams, A Biography in his Own Words, edited by James Peabody, p. 403 (1973, Newsweek, New York NY) Quoting letter by JA to Jefferson April 19, 1817, and in reference to the treaty, Thomas Jefferson, Passionate Pilgrim by Alf Mapp Jr., pp. 311 (1991, Madison Books, Lanham, MD) quoting letter by TJ to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, June, 1814.

I agree with Mr. Adams. This would be a better world without religions. The Creator has relationships with His children, not religions.

Please, take the time to learn the obvious differences between a republic and a democracy and cease using them as synonyms. If not I will be forced to add you to the list of controlled opposition found at rense.com. It is a long list and you are flocking with some very bad company.

Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone



His reply:

Hello, Dominic.

No, I do not….  The Republic is what really counts as long as its institutions are properly ordered, aligned to the Common Interest and set up within the scope of a Sovereign Nation-State.  Democracy is merely a form or organizing the mechanisms whereby different citizens will access that Nation-State to run the Destiny of the Nation.  Actually, in the US you seem to confuse Nation, State and Government.  That’s what I tried to explain in my Second Republic video.  Apparently the message did not get through to you…. Sorry…

Besides what goes under the name of “democracy” nowadays is anything BUT real democracy…   I tried to explain that it’s Money Power that rules..  So, Sir, I cannot quite understand your opening statement.

By the way, “ignorance” can never be intentional as if it were then it would not be ignorance.  I don’t think I’m a victim of residual brainwashing either,  

I fear however that it may be a rash case of you not listening attentively… 

Anyway, you are always free to add me to any list you may want… 

So am I!!   Actually, you gave me an idea, and  maybe I’ll put you on the “List of the Intentionally Ignorant”…

Sincerely,

Adrian Salbuchi


My reply:

Hello, Adrian.

I'm very surprised you even replied. And I'm even more shocked that you continue to sell the democracy LIE. The founding fathers of my country gave me a constitutional republic, not any form of democracy.  The founders knew about democracies and they were steadfast in their desire to avoid it.

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” - John Adams

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" Franklin, Benjamin

"Hence it is that democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and in general have been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths... A republic, by which I mean a government in which a scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect and promises the cure for which we are seeking." (James Madison, Federalist Papers, the McClean Edition, Federalist Paper #10, page 81, 1788)
Not a founder, but what a great quote:

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." C.S. Lewis

I'm sorry, I find it hard to believe you can be so ignorant as it regards the blatant differences between a republic and a democracy. You are like the moral busybody tormenting us with the approval of your own conscience.

Let's move on and look at your own words, shall we?

"The Republic is what really counts as long as its institutions are properly ordered, aligned to the Common Interest and set up within the scope of a Sovereign Nation-State.  Democracy is merely a form or organizing the mechanisms whereby different citizens will access that Nation-State to run the Destiny of the Nation. " Adrian (the rense.com shill) Salbuchi

Do you know what we "intentionally ignorant" call that, Adrian? RHETORIC.
It means nothing unless we take the time to define the socialist catch phrases like; "properly ordered", and "common interest", and "Nation-State", and last but surely not least, "Destiny of the Nation".

Here are words from one not as intentionally ignorant as you and I:


What Nietzsche Said
"There are still peoples and herds somewhere, but not with us, my brothers: here there are states.

The state? What is that? Well then! Now open your ears, for now I shall speak to you of the death of peoples.

The state is the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly it lies, too; and this lie creeps from its mouth; 'I, the state, am the people.'

It is a lie! It was creators who created peoples and hung a faith and a love over them: thus they served life.

It is destroyers who set snares for many and call it the state: they hang a sword and a hundred desires over them.

Where a people still exists, there the people do not understand the state and hate it as the evil eye and sin against custom and law.

I offer you this sign: every people speaks its own language of good and evil: its neighbor does not understand this language. It invented this language for itself in custom and law.

But the state lies in all languages of good and evil; and whatever it says, it lies -- and whatever it has, it has stolen.

Everything about it is false; it bites with stolen teeth. Even its belly is false.

Confusion of the language of good and evil; I offer you this sign of the state. Truly, this sign indicates the will to death! Truly, it beckons to the preachers of death!

Many too many are born: the state was invented for the superfluous!

Just see how it lures them, the many-too-many! How it devours them, and chews them, and re-chews them!

...It would like to range heroes and honorable men about it, this new idol! It likes to sun itself in the sunshine of good consciences -- this cold monster!

It will give you everything if you worship it, this new idol: thus it buys for itself the luster of your virtues and the glance of your proud eyes.

It wants to use you to lure the many-too-many. Yes, a cunning device of Hell has here been devised, a horse of death jingling with the trappings of divine honors!

Yes, a death for many has here been devised that glorifies itself as life: truly a heart-felt service to all preachers of death!

I call it the state where everyone, good and bad, is a poison-drinker: the state where everyone, good and bad, loses himself: the state where universal slow suicide is called -- life."

The language used to subjugate, control, and dominate others I lump together as "Slavespeak." Slavespeak is similar to the word Newspeak, invented by George Orwell and described in his book Nineteen-Eighty-Four. I use Slavespeak in essentially the same way Orwell used Newspeak, except that Slavespeak covers more words than I think Orwell would have regarded as Newspeak. Slavespeak includes words like: "state," "government," "law," "king," "constitution," "queen," "president," "prime minister," "nation," "country," "anthem," etc.

ON CONTROL AND LYING

THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN CONTROL PEOPLE IS TO LIE TO THEM. You can write that down in your book in great big letters. The only way you can control anybody is to lie to them. When you find an individual is lying to you, you know that the individual is trying to control you. One way or another this individual is trying to control you. That is the mechanism of control. This individual is lying to you because he is trying to control you -- because if they give you enough misinformation they will pull you down the tone scale so that they can control you. Conversely, if you see an impulse on the part of a human being to control you, you know very well that that human being is lying to you. Not "is going to," but "is" lying to you.

source

Now, why is Adrian selling the Nation-State lie, and the democracy lie? He is controlled opposition. Control is what they are all about.


Call me whatever you want, but don't call the land of my birth a democracy and cease trying to sell such evil to we Americans. Start whatever list you like, Adrian. Try and convince my fellow countrymen that I'm ignorant. They will fall for your nation-state lie before they fall for your false assessment of me.
This is going to be such fun, hey, Adrian?
Consider yourself exposed. You and your ilk will not win, and in fact, you are already done. You just can't quite see the light, yet!
The obviously controlled opposition is not the real opposition. You can't win when you don't know who the real opposition is. We are everywhere and nowhere. We are individuals and we are many.
You are the first shill to be exposed at http://www.circleonerecords.com/The_Flashlight.html


Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone


More from Adrian...

Hello, Dominic, 

Did you get my separate E-mail with the article on Democracy?

Several points:

1)     I do not buy “democracy”.  But it’s been instilled into people’s brains.  If you want to get a message across and undo something that has been hammered into people’s brains irrationally (it certainly has in Argentina where the bulk of the population thinks in terms of “either you support ‘democracy’ or you favour military dictatorships”…  Dominic: DO keep in mind that I write from Argentina which has a different reality than your country), then it’s better to persuade than to try to impose.   If you try to impose, many people will not dare cross the threshold to listen to your whole story,

2)     I support what Plato says in “The Republic”:  Democracy is the next to last stage of social degradation, right before Tyrrany.  He was sure right on that!!

3)     I’ll stop here because you have taken a very insulting attitude, with name-calling and purposely distorting what I say in my videos and elsewhere, taking things out of context and perversely “interpreting” things as suits you.  I don’t know what axe you have to grind, or if you are part of the Daryl B Smith gang.  Either way, I don’t really care.  So… if you continue insulting and lying, then there’s not much more we can talk about.  

If you wish to continue a balanced and mature dialogue, let me know, otherwise….

Regards,

Adrian Salbuchi 

PS: I don’t give a hoot on any junk lies you may post about me on your blog…


Hello Adrian,
I want to thank you for ignoring just about everything in my e-mail. Very typical of the rense.com gang.
I never accused you of buying democracy. You are selling it, not buying it. Your actions and words are an attempt to keep it instilled in the brain of others, not remove it.
Birds of a feather flock together. Have you not heard this recent revelation in Argentina? Or is that truth not part of Argentine reality?
You have been warned that you are flocking with very bad company. If you can't see this truth it's because you insist on keeping your blinders on.
You most certainly do use republic and democracy as synonyms in your writings. If it is not intentional, then change it.
The best musicians listen to their music and critique it. You need to re-read what you write and give yourself an honest critique. When you do this you will easily be able to see what I'm talking about.
Also, don't forget to re-read all your many posts found at youtube. It is not what a man puts in his mouth that defiles him. It's what comes out of his mouth, because that is what is in his heart.

I have never heard of Daryl B Smith. Have you ever heard of Nietzsche, Adrian?
Something tells me you and your love for the coldest of all cold monsters (state) are none too happy with Nietzsche. Hence, you ignore his words like they don't exist.
There are no lies from my keyboard at my website. I'm not trying to impose anything. I expose with my flashlight, not impose. I was given the flashlight and told to shine it on darkness, not try to persuade anyone.
There are many lies from the rense.com gang. The pretend patriots are the ones attempting to impose their will using false information. It takes lies to control people. Go to rense.com and see if you can find any lies, Adrian.
If you are an honest person, why are you flocking with LIARS?
The word liar is not a name, it is a title, like pedophile and murderer.
BTW, it is called a website, not a blog. How will you persuade the intelligent with such folly?
Move on, Adrian. You have done nothing to convince me you are anything but controlled opposition.
The revelation of who you really are and who you are really with will remain on my website.
Straighten up, lift up your head, your redemption is drawing near!

Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone


More from Adrian...

Hello, Dominic,
Wow!!! You have a hell of any Ego!!!
That's probably good for you to get ahead in the world... Anyway, I sense
you're an honest, philosophical person...
Yes, I've read Nietzsche, though he is not my very favourite. My deepest
inspirations come from:
- Richard Wagner (I've written an extensive philosophical treatise on his
two key prophetic works: The Ring Cycle and Parsifal) as well as the
movements he inspired after his death...
- Carl G. Jung - Swiss Psychoanalyst
- Miguel Serrano - Chilean diplomat (and close friend of mine)
- Carl Schmitt - German Political Scientist
- Jacque De Mahieu - French Political scientist (and close friend of mine)
- William Shakespeare (far more political than most people realize)
- William Blake (19th century English Romantic Poet)
- Ezra Pound (American poet who's written the best common sense explanation
on economics I've ever read)
- Carroll Quigley (US insider turned subtle whistleblower),
- John K Galbraith (idem)
- Juan Domingo Perón... (Greatest 20th Century Argentine and South American
leader)....

Whew!!! By now, you probably want to throw the kitchen sink at me!!! Ha!
Ha!
Listen, Dominic: You're not gonna twist my arm and obviously I'm not gonna
twist yours nor would I ever want to.
A close friend of mine always says "when two intelligent people speak, they
NEVER agree on everything: only dummies agree on everything..."
Surely that's our case as neither of us is any dummy...
One difference though: I live and let live and would never go around
publicly saying "Dominic's this or that" or "Dominic's a bloody structural
idiot" or whatever... You do. Your call...
Over and out...
Adrian


My reply...

Adrian,

My confidence does not come from hell. I'm not trying to get ahead in the world. I'm in the world but certainly not of it. You have obviously convinced yourself of your intelligence, but I'm not at all impressed with your ability to spew falsities nor the company you keep. Did all that alleged studying lead you to rense.com?
I'm shining light, not throwing sinks or twisting arms.
Did you find any lies at rense.com, Adrian?
I did not think so.

When one has the ability to lie with impunity, they are always found uttering contradictions.

One difference though: I live and let live and would never go around
publicly saying "Dominic's this or that" or "Dominic's a bloody structural
idiot" or whatever... You do.

Do you recall typing these words?

Anyway, you are always free to add me to any list you may want…

So am I!! Actually, you gave me an idea, and maybe I’ll put you on the “List of the Intentionally Ignorant”…

Sincerely,
Adrian Salbuchi

You would never do that, or maybe you will, which is it, Adrian?
There's more...

A close friend of mine always says "when two intelligent people speak, they
NEVER agree on everything: only dummies agree on everything..."
Surely that's our case as neither of us is any dummy...

Am I not a dummy or am I worthy of your list of the intentionally ignorant?

Just like you can't find any lies at rense.com, I'm sure you can't see these obvious contradictions, can you, Adrian?
When did I say Adrian is a bloody idiot? I said you are speaking lies and flocking with liars at rense.com, hence, you are controlled opposition.
Of course, you can't speak the truth in this matter. The Truth is not your friend is He, Adrian?
Did you find any lies at rense.com?
Again, I did not think so!
Did the truth that birds of a feather flock together make it to Argentina, yet, Adrian?
BTW, we are to teach what we have been taught. If you really believe that I'm lying then it is your duty to reveal what you have found.
Love compels you to do so.
But, your leader does not teach you such nonsense, does he, Adrian.
Move on, already.
Straighten up, lift up your head, your redemption is drawing near.

Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone


I've asked him to move on, but the Adrians of this world need to get the last false words in. I think it makes their father proud or something. Anyway, here is more utter nonsense from Adrian...

Dominic,
I too believe these are End Times.
But you see, I feel Christian-Hellenic.. NOT judeo-Christian.
That's why maybe I take a calmer stance whilst you write with a tone
reminiscent of that Stanic Demiurge YHWH speaking...
I can smell the fire and brimstone in your tone.
Redemption IS near...
Good luck!!
Adrian

PS: Jeff Rense has always been a true gentleman with me, and he never once
censored or conditioned anything I said on his program. Not that I agree
with all he says. For example, I do not believe in beings from another
planet. I believe in Truly Ancients from This planet... But Jeff Rense is
a good and respectful friend.


My final reply...

Adrian,

You don't read my words. When did I declare these to be "end times"? I'm not any type of Christian.
All forms of Christianity are a fraud. Take the time to read the Bible and compare that to any sect of Christianity and see the light!
If you smell fire and brimstone it most certainly is not from my keyboard, check your backside, buddy.
It is called the great and terrible day for a reason. First one smells fire and brimstone then they become ashes trampled under foot.
Will it be a terrible day for Rense and his ilk?
We shall all see, soon enough.
By their fruits you will know them.
Do good trees produce bad fruit?
Rense and his alien garbage are there to bring ridicule to the little truth his website presents.
That obvious nonsense is not even worth noting, let alone, shining the light on. I shine the light on all the many lies that can actually ensnare, not the sci-fi presented as possibly being of truth.
True gentlemen do not automatically become honest people.
Rense's website is filled with outright LIES.
I've been exposing his guest "writers" for years.
The song remains the same at rense.com!
Can you say in all honesty that you can find no blatant LIES at rense.com?
The Truth is alive and rense.com is not His friend.
We are known by the company we keep.
I'm with the Truth, you are with rense.com, the greatest collection of controlled opposition found on the net.
Move on, already.
Await your reward, Adrian!

Straighten up, lift up your head, your redemption is drawing near!

Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone


"You can never have a revolution in order to establish a democracy. You must have a democracy in order to have a revolution." - G.K. Chesterton "Tremendous Trifles, 1909"

The controlled opposition found at rense.com is trying to foment a revolution. They use the, "America is a democracy" lie. Or they take the Salbuchi approach and declare the USA is no longer a real democracy. By their fruits you will know them.

Here are some of rense.com's greatest hits:TC

"...This point is timely with the recent Texas Board of Education approval of a new school curriculum, which influences all textbooks. Some of their additions include:

Question the Founding Fathers' commitment to a purely secular government

  • Cover the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation's Founding Fathers, but not highlight the philosophical rationale for the separation of church and state
  • Stress the superiority of American capitalism while eliminating the word "capitalism" from the text
  • Refer to the United States form of government as a "constitutional republic," rather than "democratic republic"
  • Give Confederate president Jefferson Davis equal footing with Abraham Lincoln

Did SARTRE just attempt to sell the "democratic republic" LIE by mocking the idea of constitutional republic?  

What about the Founding Fathers Judeo-Christian influences?

You must be mistaken. Check it out...The early presidents and patriots were generally Deists or Unitarians, believing in some form of impersonal Providence but rejecting the divinity of Jesus and the absurdities of the Old and New testaments.

Thomas Paine was a pamphleteer whose manifestos encouraged the faltering spirits of the country and aided materially in winning the war of Independence:
I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of...Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all."
From:
The Age of Reason by Thomas Paine, pp. 8,9 (Republished 1984, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY)

George Washington, the first president of the United States, never declared himself a Christian according to contemporary reports or in any of his voluminous correspondence. Washington Championed the cause of freedom from religious intolerance and compulsion. When John Murray (a universalist who denied the existence of hell) was invited to become an army chaplain, the other chaplains petitioned Washington for his dismissal. Instead, Washington gave him the appointment. On his deathbed, Washinton uttered no words of a religious nature and did not call for a clergyman to be in attendance.
From:
George Washington and Religion by Paul F. Boller Jr., pp. 16, 87, 88, 108, 113, 121, 127 (1963, Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, TX)

Thomas Jefferson, third president and author of the Declaration of Independence, said:"I trust that there is not a young man now living in the United States who will not die a Unitarian." He referred to the Revelation of St. John as "the ravings of a maniac" and wrote:
The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ levelled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them: and for this obvious reason that nonsense can never be explained."
From:
Thomas Jefferson, an Intimate History by Fawn M. Brodie, p. 453 (1974, W.W) Norton and Co. Inc. New York, NY) Quoting a letter by TJ to Alexander Smyth Jan 17, 1825, and Thomas Jefferson, Passionate Pilgrim by Alf Mapp Jr., pp. 246 (1991, Madison Books, Lanham, MD) quoting letter by TJ to John Adams, July 5, 1814.

"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter." -- Thomas Jefferson (letter to J. Adams April 11,1823)

James Madison, fourth president and father of the Constitution, was not religious in any conventional sense. "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution."

From:
The Madisons by Virginia Moore, P. 43 (1979, McGraw-Hill Co. New York, NY) quoting a letter by JM to William Bradford April 1, 1774, and James Madison, A Biography in his Own Words, edited by Joseph Gardner, p. 93, (1974, Newsweek, New York, NY) Quoting Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments by JM, June 1785.

source

I brought these quotes and more to Devvy(the controlled opposition) Kidd years ago. She passed them off by declaring she can bring a quote that proves the Founder Fathers were Christians for every quote I can bring. I'm still waiting for said quotes. If the Founding Fathers can go on record with the quotes I brought and still call themselves Christians, then they are a collective bunch of hypocrites.. However, the Founding Fathers were not hypocrites. Devvy Kidd is a fraud. She pretends to be opposition, but she is with them. The website: rense.com is one of the best collections of controlled opposition found on the net. I will not take the time to bring the entire list of pretend patriots I've come across on the net. But here is more from rense.com...

Good morning, J. Speer-William,

You wrote: "It would seem to me that if the tenets of the Christian religion could be contained within the 1,300 pages of the Holy Bible, America does not need 900,000 to millions of pages of legislation, orders, directives, and regulations to be governed. How can we obey those laws if we don't know what they are?"

The Old Testament and the ark of the covenant belong to the Christian religion and are part of their tenets?
You are not being serious are you?
The Jews had the writings and the religion, the Romans had the empire. The Jews wrote and maintained the Torah, not the Romans that later became known as Christians.
Where is Sunday Worship found in the Bible?
Where is Easter found in the Bible?
Where is Christmas, or any mass, for that matter, found in the Bible?
Where is trinity found in the Bible?
Most of the Christian doctrines and dogma are not found anywhere among the 1300 pages.
PATHETIC, J. Speer-William!

There is more: "But, the critical questions thinking Americans will ask themselves run along the lines of who wrote the hundreds of thousands of pages of US legislation, orders, directives, and regulations that so severely affect our lives. That Madame and Sir was the point of my satirical piece, and is the important point of this article."

No, J. Speer-William, real thinking Americans know the type of legislation you speak of is not law but is NULL AND VOID. It not only does not "severely affect our lives" it has no force, whatsoever.

Some much needed edification for those flocking with rense.com:

"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it."
- Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 256 137, 180

Instead of using lies to scare people, why not tell them that the blatantly unconstitutional health care legislation is already null and void and we don't need a decision from some court branding it so?
That truth will make people free, what will your deceptions accomplish, J. Speer-William?

"When a legislature undertakes to proscribe the exercise of a citizen's constitutional rights it acts lawlessly and the citizen can take matters into his own hands and proceed on the basis that such a law is no law at all." - Justice William O. Douglas

Now, will you bring the truth or will you continue to spread fear using false information and earn your place on the list of controlled oppostion found at rense.com?

Sincerely,

Dominic J. Circolone


Here is the reply,

Domonic, since we appear to be on the same side, it would behoove us not to attack each other. Love and Light, Jack


I did not attack you, Jack.
I took your easily exposed LIES to task...
Since you refuse to repent and simply proceeded to pretend we are on the same side, your name has been added to the list of controlled opposition found at rense.com!
It's a long list and you are in bad company, Jack.
Straighten up, lift up your head, your redemption is drawing near...

Sincerely,

Dominic J. Circolone


Hey Jack,

I see you are up to your LYING ways, again.
You are really trying to sell the America is a democracy LIE?
That is even more PATHETIC than your previous attempt to spread false information.
Instead of spreading easily exposed LIES, how about taking some time to learn if your readers are really "INDIVIDUALS" as defined in the I.R. CODE.

See you on that day your many evil deeds get judged, champ!


Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone


Dear Domonic,

The snow has melted, it's warm. Leave Florida and come home. We miss you.

Love and Peace, Jack  P.S. Sorry, you don't like my articles. I'll try harder.


Jacky,
I'm more than certain LYING comes naturally to you and you have no need to try harder to be the best LIAR you can be.

See you on that great and terrible day, Jack (the LIAR) Williams! You make your father very proud, Jacky!

Sincerely,

Dominic John Circolone


Domonic, Any chance you'll be home for the first Yankee game? I'd love to watch it on your big screen, I'll bring the beer.


Jacky,

tick...tock...tick...tock...

Sincerely,

DJC


Much more to come...


Dominic Circolone

We are awaiting the result of your research into the obvious chemtrails being sprayed upon us on a regular basis. My wife sent you plenty of research materials. Are you simply blowing us off? Is this another blind mouse running for politics or is this a rat I smell? We will know for certain when we see the fruit of your research. We're waiting, Pamela and co...

Pamela Gorman's response:
Dominic- I am sorry, but I don't buy into the theories that you do. Naturally, if I later learn that I was wrong and that there is some kind of conspiracy to hurt Americans by spraying chemicals on us, as you propose, then I will do everything in my power to stop it. At this point, however, I don't find the arguments compelling. If this is the one issue on which you vote, then I assume you will work to find another candidate of the 11 in my race to support who does believe as you do on this point. If not, then know that I respect your right to have this opinion and I am sure we agree on many other points.



Pamela, where is my post from earlier this morning? Since you made it disappear it is apparent you don't believe in the right to freedom of speech and instead have chosen to censor my words. If we wait for you to get your blinders removed then it will be too late for those already injured from the obvious chemtrail spraying taking place. Have you no heart, woman? Clearly you have no shame. She is just another rat playing politics while the innocent suffer. There are 1,600,000 links that talk about the "theory" you don't buy into. Truth and freedom of speech, Pamela Gorman doesn't buy into such nonsense, apparently.


Theory or fact, Pamela? Just how uninformed are you?

Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House)

HR 2977 IH... See More

107th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2977

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 2, 2001

Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.

Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.

SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.

The President shall--

(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and

(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.

SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.

The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.

SEC. 5. REPORT.

The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--

(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and

(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.

Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--

(1) space exploration;

(2) space research and development;

(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or

(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:

(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;

(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;

(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or
extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.

(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--

(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or

(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;

(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.


Is she really simply uninformed and therefore does not know about an American's right to free speech? Or is she someone that we cannot trust and should never get the political positions she seeks?
Do you really want to vote for one that disregards the supreme law of the land and instead chooses to play authoritarian by censoring an individual's words?
Think, people, think!

Pamela Gorman's response:
Dominic, unlike you, I have been respectful and kept my comments to the issue. Name-calling and accusations of collusion simply because someone doesn't agree with you is not good for meaningful discourse.

What? How is your last post about the topic of chemtrails and the proposed legislation I presented? You are guilty of that which you accuse me of. PATHETIC, Pamela. How is declaring facts that you don't buy into, "theories" good for meaningful discourse?

I don't need someone declaring just how respectful they allege to be while they censor my words. That is the epitome of disrespect, woman. You are a fraud and this interaction proves it.
You better get to deleting this interaction, as well, because it shows you in your true light.
However, you will find your ability to deny people their right to free speech plastered far and wide. Beginning right here in this forum.
Did you read the proposed legislation regarding the "theory" you don't buy into? Of course, NOT! You don't care about people. You care about being elected.
The fact that you call chemtrials a theory you don't buy into, when there has been legislation proposed defining the exact word you don't believe in, will get published, as well.

Delete away, woman. Censor to your heart’s content. It will only come back to bite you. You are way over your head, Pamela. If you are a smart woman you will cease burying yourself.



Pamela Gorman is a snake in the grass. She has removed this interaction from her wall as though it never happened. Oh, but the proof is right here. Some people have no shame, and Pamela Gorman is one of them. She is against freedom of speech and she does not deserve to be a paid government worker. Instead of reading proposed legislation that includes stopping chemtrail spraying, proving it is more than a "theory", she refused to even read the material or consider it a reality. We don't need more rats nor snakes in politics. Pamela Gorman is nothing but more of the same we always get from those running around calling themselves, government. She is against the truth and against an American's right to free speech. Despicable. If we the people actually counted the votes, a snake like Pamela Gorman would have no chance at winning an election. But, we don't count the votes and she must know that those that do count the votes will not hold her hate for truth and freedom of speech against her. Ask her what she thinks of the right to free speech? When she LIES and declares she is for it, then ask her why she censored my posts? She censored the wrong person and will now rue the day she decided to do so. You can censor my posts but you can't hide the truth Pamela Gorman. Get your team ready for damage control...

Michal Circolone responds:


I noticed many of Gorman's vocal fans are affiliated with the military one way or another (parents of troops, active service, military volunteers etc.). Any wonder she does not want to touch the topic?


How does that go? Birds of a feather flock together. It will be a great and terrible day when the truth of who really did the dastardly deed on 9/11/01 is finally revealed. Are there any that run around calling themselves government that have anything to do with TRUTH?
I've got a bad case of the Deakin/Gorman blues.


TAC: What social issues legislation is needed in 2005?

PG: ...Additionally, I strongly support the Second Amendment protections which our Founders thought important enough to place directly behind freedom of speech and assembly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
How is the guaranteed right to bear arms, that cannot be abrogated, considered social issue legislation? Pamela Gorman has already proved she is AGAINST FREEDOM OF SPEECH. She is not to be trusted and it will be a shame if she is chosen in the upcoming election. Just say no to Pamela Gorman and say yes to unalienable rights.


Email from Repub Rep Pamela Gorman re Clean Elections

In regards to 1013…

The Clean Elections system is wrought with errors that deny you, the voter, your rights and freedoms guaranteed to you by our U.S. Constitution. Specifically, it denies you your right to Free Speech,...

A nice idea, perhaps. But, in practice, a disaster for democracy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pamela Gorman has proved, without a shadow of doubt, she is against Freedom of Speech. The clean elections system never denied me my right to Free Speech, but Pamela Gorman most certainly did.
What a HYPOCRITE.
Now, we find she believes and spreads the America is a democracy LIE. Has this woman ever read the US Constitution? We are not a democracy but a republican form of government. See Article 4, section 4.
Wow, the more one researches Pamela Gorman the more one realizes just how untrustworthy she really is. We don't need another anti-constitutional HYPOCRITE that spreads the democracy LIE, in the US Congress.


RECENT ACTIVITY
Dominic wrote on Pamela Gorman's Wall.

Now, go to Pamela Gorman's wall and see if you can find any comments from me on her wall. She attempted to censor them but I've made sure to post them here on my wall.


SB 1070 – What to do now
By Pamela Gorman | May 12, 2010

"...Keep your words and yours actions above the fray and always respectful of the right to publicly congregate to exercise free speech."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
She is simply a total HYPOCRITE. She denied me my right to free speech so don't buy her, "...always be respectful of the right to publicly congregate to exercise free speech.", statement. I can go on and on simply using this woman's own words, and go on and on I most certainly will.
Soon, I will move this to my web page called, The Flashlight, so one does not need to join Facebook in order to learn the truth about Pamela Gorman!